Statement of National Importance
Cultural Significance
The monument's cultural significance can be expressed as follows:
Intrinsic Characteristics
The priory buildings are sited along a cliff on the west bank of the River Clyde. MacGibbon and Ross (1896-7) identified the building at the north end of the cluster as the prior's house. It comprises ground floor rooms separated by a stair well that gave access to a first floor. In 2014, the walls stood about 1.5m high being best preserved on the north side. A small courtyard lies south of this building at the west end and to the east is the east wall of a second building with windows overlooking the Clyde. To the south of the courtyard, a fragment of the west wall of a third building has been recorded as containing a stone basin or 'stoup'; this led to the suggestion that it was the chapel, though MacGibbon and Ross (1896-7) suggest that the church is more likely to have stood to the south of the visible buildings. Remains of a fourth building with evidence for a vault lie at the southeast end of the cluster. The boundary wall stood about 4m high in 2014 on the north side; on the west and south sides it was no more than 0.5m high. Beyond the west wall, the ditch and bank are substantial features; in 2014 the bank was some 1.5m high measuring from the base of the ditch. Although the upstanding remains are in ruinous condition, the monument appears to be in relatively stable condition, with high potential for buried archaeological remains to survive in good condition.
Study of both the upstanding structures and the buried remains has high potential to provide important information about the layout, development sequence and abandonment of the priory. There is particular potential for evidence about the position of the priory church, the relationship between the priory and the external ditch and bank, and any structural changes associated with the priory's later function as a private residence. More widely, the site has the potential to inform study of medieval monastic religious practice, society and economy.
Historical records suggest a development sequence, with the priory being founded in the first half of the 13th century and remaining in use until the Reformation in the later 16th century. The priory was secularised in 1599 and passed to the Stewarts who used the buildings as a private residence. Lady Blantyre and her daughters left the priory in 1606 leaving Lord Blantyre behind. It is not clear when the priory was finally abandoned. For most of its occupation, the monument served spiritual, social and economic functions. Later, when it became secularised, it served a domestic function.
Contextual Characteristics
Priories often conform to a relatively standardised layout. This example is of particular interest as the arrangement has been partially dictated by the distinctive topography of the site. The priory has made good use of the steep cliffs to the east and the north to add to the physical and symbolical demarcation of the priory from the outside world, while making the buildings imposing. However, the uneven ground has confined the priory buildings to a relatively small area of flat land along the cliff edge, with the garth being positioned on higher ground between the buildings and the boundary wall to the west.
Bothwell Castle (scheduled monument reference SM90038, Canmore ID 44889) is located on the opposite bank of the River Clyde and faced the priory, but was not held by the families who endowed the priory. Blantyre Priory was probably founded by Patrick, Earl of Dunbar and his wife and was occupied by monks of the Augustinian order. Both Blantyre Priory and Restenneth Priory in Angus (SM 90246, Canmore 33745) were cells of Jedburgh Abbey (SM 13126, Canmore ID 57020).
Associative Characteristics
Historical sources suggest the abbey was founded by Patrick, Earl of Dunbar and his wife in the first half of the 13th century and maintained as a cell of Jedburgh Abbey. The priory was secularised in 1599 and passed to the Stewarts who used the buildings as a private residence. Lady Blantyre and her daughters left the priory in 1606 leaving Lord Blantyre behind. It is not clear when the priory was finally abandoned.
The monument reflects medieval cultural preferences for the display of wealth and status through the patronage of monastic foundations. The form of the monument and its architectural details reflect medieval monastic spiritual devotion through worship, work and study.
National importance
The monument is of national importance because it has an inherent potential to make a significant contribution to our understanding of medieval monasteries, religious practice and the funding of monasteries by high status families. There is potential for relatively complex archaeology to survive which, along with analysis of the upstanding structures, can provide important information about the layout, development sequence and abandonment of the priory. In particular, there is potential to understand the position of the priory church, the relationship between the priory and the external bank and ditch and probable structural changes associated with the priory's later function as a private residence. The site is particularly important because this priory had a non-standard layout, showing how its builders responded to the opportunities and constraints of a cliff-top site. The loss of the monument would greatly diminish our ability to understand the character, chronology, adaptation and abandonment of one of Scotland's smaller monasteries.